Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Friday, March 23, 2007
Can a Christian believe a non-Christian can be saved?
So I finally wrote my paper for my religions class that I talked about in a previous post. I decided to write about whether or not a Christian can believe a non-Christian can get to heaven-- that one seemed to be the most interesting, by far! So I'll copy and paste my paper here. Let me know what you think. It's an "academic essay" (whatever the hell that means) so it's really formal and not how I usually write on here! Enjoy!
Christianity and Salvation in Regards to Other Religions
There are many different views in regard to salvation. Salvation is an extremely complex issue and cannot be discussed in one theology. In my essay, I will discuss what salvation is and specifically what Christians believe it is. I will also discuss the different views of who Christians believe are saved. Finally, I will talk about Christians believing that people of other religions can be saved.
The idea of salvation is not solely a Christian concept. Most religions have some concept of salvation, and it does not always involve the idea of a heaven. Christians believe in the saving power of the cross. They believe Jesus was perfect, died on the cross for everyone’s sins, and was resurrected 3 days after he died. Christians tend to believe that the way to be saved is through “church rituals (particularly baptism and -- in the Catholic churches -- confession), good works; Belief in: Jesus' resurrection, Jesus’ status as the only begotten Son of God, Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior; Or by some combination of the above.”[1] The debate comes from the fact that there are numerous other religions that believe in a higher power, in the person of Jesus, and the existence of people in remote areas of the world who never have and never will hear the name of Jesus. The following paragraphs will explain different beliefs about who is saved and the support each belief has.
The first belief is universalism. They believe that everyone, because of the sacrifice of Jesus, is saved. Because, according to Romans 3:23, “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,” Jesus redeemed everyone of their sins. As a result, all are saved and going to heaven. Origen argued that there is no such thing as dualism. He believed that “God will overcome evil and restore creation to its original form.”[2] He did not believe that God, who is perfect and holy, could coexist with Satan, who is evil. Robinson argued that God’s love is stronger than the evil and will eventually conquer evil, which makes “the existence of hell an impossibility.”[3] However, this theory does not take into account the need for faith in any higher power. With this theory, it does not matter what kind of person someone is—they could be a murderer or rapist who is unrepentant of what they did, and they could still get into heaven. Universalists could argue that all people are sinners, one sin is not greater than another, and because of God’s grace, and we are all saved: “For it is by grace that we have been saved… not by works, so that no one can boast” Ephesians 2:8-9.
Another belief of salvation is that only elect people can get into heaven. This theory rests heavily on the idea of pre-destination—that God chose only a few people to be saved. This theory comes from the idea that Jesus came and died for all people, but only a select few will be saved. They argue that because Jesus came and died only to save those who God had already chosen to be saved. However, those who follow this theory do not give any solid Biblical references for their beliefs and dismiss the “universality of God’s love and redemption.”[4]
The last, and most popular, belief is that only believers can get into heaven and be saved. In John 14:6, Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” This is the most popular belief among churches today. Jesus is believed to be central to someone’s salvation. If someone does not believe in, and “confess” the name of Jesus, and that he came down to earth and died for our sins, they cannot get into heaven. This belief emphasizes the importance of faith in Jesus and God in order to be saved. Augustine was a strong force behind promoting this idea originally. During the Middle Ages and the Reformation it was further supported. The writers of the time started the idea, that continues to be popular today, that nonbelievers cannot be saved. Calvin stated: “All the more vile is the stupidity of those people who open heaven to all the impious unbelieving, without the grace of him who Scripture teaches to be the only door by which we enter heaven.”[5]
In contrast to the earlier theologians, there have been others who believe that a non-Christian can be saved. In John Wesley’s sermon, “On Faith,” he “argued the need for faith in God in order to be saved—but affirmed that this faith need not be explicitly Christian in character.”[6] In the twentieth-century, C.S. Lewis wrote on the subject of who is saved. In his book, Mere Christianity, he argued that “those who commit themselves to the pursuit of goodness and truth will be saved, even if they have no formal knowledge of Christ.”[7] In regards to other religions, those who are saved are more complicated. Lewis states: “There are people in other religions who are being led by God’s secret influence top concentrate on those parts of their religion which are in agreement with Christianity, and who thus belong to Christ without knowing it.”[8] This idea supports the fact that God is present in everything.
People who have never heard of the name of Jesus or God can still acknowledge the presence of a higher being. In Romans 1:20, Paul states: “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.” God is omnipresent, so God is in remote areas of the world where people who have not heard of the name of Jesus would be able to experience Him. If Augustine were to argue this point he would most likely use John 14:6, referencing Jesus saying that he is the only way to be saved. One could state that a person does not necessarily have to acknowledge the person of Jesus to be saved. He came, died, was resurrected and left the Holy Spirit on the earth, so it is through the Holy Spirit that Jesus and God are revealed. Because Jesus, God, and the Holy Spirit are one entity, acknowledging the presence of one acknowledges the presence of all three.
Western Christianity is very western-centric and we do not have a clear understanding of other religions, and even the beliefs and practices of Christians in other parts of the world. Other religions believe in a higher being and some even believe in the existence of Jesus. (Islam—Allah and Jesus as a prophet, Judaism—believe in God who is Jesus) God is truth, and if another religion or person lives in a truth, it is following God’s way. In Rob Bell’s book, Velvet Elvis, he talks about all truth being God’s truth, no matter where the truth is found. He references Paul’s writings in the book of Acts where Paul quotes one of the poets of the place he is staying. The poet spoke truth. If all truth is God’s truth then the poet unknowingly spoke God’s truth.[9]
It is possible, although not always accepted, that Christians can believe that people of other religions can be saved. Christians tend to be very exclusive and intolerant of other religions, not accepting the idea of God’s truth being present in everything, including other religions’ beliefs and doctrines. Although Jesus said he is the way to be saved, it is not defined how exactly that is seen or decided. People can live a life for Christ and not consider themselves Christians.
In conclusion, Christians believe in the saving power of the cross of Christ. However, Christians can also believe that non-Christians, who do not believe in the cross, can be saved. In this essay, I explained the different views about who is saved and who is not. I also explained that it is possible for Christians to believe that nonbelievers and people of other religions can be saved.
[1]B.A. Robinson, Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, Religioustolerance.org, http://www.religioustolerance.org/salvatio.htm, 2007
[2] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[3] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[4] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[5] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[6] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[7] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[8] Alister E. McGrath, Christian Theology, (
[9] Rob Bell, Velvet Elvis,, (
[10] Rob Bell, Velvet Elvis,, (
Posted by
Kate
at
1:21 AM
3
comments
Thursday, March 22, 2007
"Amazing Grace" is AMAZING!!
A couple of weeks ago, my roommate, Holly, and I had tried to go see the movie, "Amazing Grace," except that about 40 minutes into it, the power in the entire movie complex went out! Needless to say, we were devistated! After only 40 minutes I was already set to buy the movie when it comes out on video! Anyway, we finally go to go see the entire movie last night and I was in awe the entire time! It was a fabulous movie! I highly recommend the movie if you get a chance to see it!
The entire movie was so motivating for me! The perseverence of William Wilburforce and the undying passion he had was mind-blowing! He believed so strongly in the abolition of slavery, even though there was so much going against him. Slavery has been around since forever (it's in the Bible for crying out loud!)... that alone would be enough for me to not want to go against it! God gave him the purpose and call on his life to be the voice behind the abolition of slavery. I liked that the movie showed that just because he knew that that was what God called him to, it was not always easy to continue fighting for what he believed in. But he continued to fight, even when his health was deteriorating. After decades of fighting for the cause, God finally opened the door to make all of his work worthwhile. I have to admit that I bawled at the end! All of that work and he could go home and sleep and rest well knowing his mission for the abolition of slavery was complete! I can't imagine that kind of relief! What's even greater is that once he was done fighting that battle, he continued to battle more injustices he saw. He never stopped fighting, never stopped walking in the calling God put on his life. What an amazing man!
His life shows how, with a lot of work and perseverence, we can change the world! In the movie, one of the characters says, "If you make the world better in one way, it becomes better in every way." Whoa! What a concept! We need to listen to what God is calling us to and follow that call with all of our hearts and being. We need to fight the fight set before us, never stopping. It may take minutes, it may take decades... however long it takes, we need to maintain the strength in God and rely on Him and others to help us in whatever cause or problem or whatever. I am so energized by the thought of the possibilities of what could change, with one person's voice and the strength God has given them. We can change the world, one fight of injustice at a time!
Oh, so I'm a movie-quote-aholic and I'm a total loser in the fact that as I was watching the movie, I had my little notebook out and a pen ready for all of the great and inspirational quotes in the movie. So I wrote a few down and I thought I'd share them with you! Here they are:
~ "It is a sad fate for a man to die too well known to everybody else, and still unknown to himself."-- Francis Bacon (quoted by Richard the butler)
~ "We're too young to realize that certain things are impossible, but we do them anyways." -- Pitt
~ "Will you use your voice to praise God or change the world?" -- (don't remember)
~ "Sometimes God does his work with a slight drizzle, not a stone." -- John Newton
~ "He's an optimist-- completely incurable!"-- Richard the butler
~ "I'm a great sinner and Christ is a great savior!" -- John Newton
GO SEE THE MOVIE!! IT'S FANTASTIC!!!!!!!
Posted by
Kate
at
4:31 PM
3
comments
Labels: convictions, faith, God, injustice, movies
Sunday, March 11, 2007
More Questions Than Answers
So I have spring break this week (that is one thing I will miss when I'm not in school!) but I have to spend some time of it writing 2 papers... ugh! Well, at least starting them. Anyway, one of them is for my religions class-- which I'm still loving by the way-- and I thought I'd get other people's insight cuz they're not easy questions to answer. We have the option to write about one of 5 questions. Here are the two I am thinking about writing about:
1) Is Christianity a monotheistic religion?
-- This was a very interesting discussion because I have grown up in the church and it was never a question as to whether or not we believed in one God; Jesus and the Holy Spirit are just part of God (use whatever analogy you wish to explain it--the egg one is my favorite). So at first my answer was, "Yes, duh!"However, in this class, we discussed the question of: how it is possible to think of Jesus as fully God as well as fully human? If he's human, he can't be God, but if he's God, he can't be human... well, according to logical thought. And if Jesus was praying to God and was the son of God, that would make him separate, right? Well, I'm not saying I believe that, but it definitely gives you something to think about and gives me a big headache! But it did get me thinking about this issue. How would you discuss that? How can Jesus be God AND human at the same time, all the while being God himself? Any thoughts? I'll definitely be wrestling with this and researching it (I'll have to see what our theology textbook has to say about this... I'll get back to everyone about what I find). But I'd love to hear what everyone else thinks.
2) Can a Christian believe that members of other religions are “saved”?
-- It's kinda funny cuz we got this assignment and I got onto my blog reader thingy and Paul had written a blog about this issue! Crazy! (I'll post a comment about it when I read it, and especially if I write my paper on this!) So I am going to read that (it's really long!) and see what he has to say as well I'd love to hear what everyone else thinks! When we discussed this in class, I was in a group with mostly Christian (well, self-proclaimed) girls and we really struggled with this issue. It would be great if everyone got into heaven. The discussion always came around to "what about the guy in the middle of nowhere? will he go to heaven if he's never heard about God/Jesus?" That question was a little easier to answer or at least give a decent answer for, but what I want to know is what about the people in the Middle East who strongly believe that their religion is the truth? Or even the Muslims, Jews, Mormons, Catholics, etc. in the US? Does it come down to theology? Cuz Muslims believe in Jesus, just that he was a prophet, not the son of God. And Jews believe in God-- and if Jesus is God, would that mean they indirectly believe in Jesus? What about Catholics and Mormons who have very similar beliefs but different values and some VERY different beliefs but the core beliefs are the same? Cuz they all believe in Jesus. Where is the line drawn? Is there any way to know? Isn't it very prideful for Christians to say they have the one and only way to heaven? Let me know what you think!
--Also, any good references would be greatly appreciated for either of these questions-- books, websites, Bible verses, etc! Feel free to comment about only one or both! I'd love to hear what people have to say and think!
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
Behind Closed Doors
It's amazing the conversations you have late at night when everyone's dead tired. Tonight's topic between my sister, my roommate, and I was about purity and physical boundaries in a relationship. Since we're all involved in relationships (all of us to wonderful guys!), it was a very pertinent and applicable discussion. The topic of purity came up and I was quick to point out that there is no single definition of purity in a relationship. Some people see no kissing ever to be the only way to have a pure relationship. Others see wandering hands as the limit, others (religious and non-religious alike) don't see the need for purity or don't see anything wrong with going "all the way" (aka SEX!). People seem quick to judge others' boundaries and limits, especially those that make people blush to talk about. But why is that anyone else's business? God convicts people of different things, which was talked about well in Michael's blog (it's from a while ago), and people can give their input, but telling others how to live their lives and conduct their romantic relationships is not what God tells us to do!
My sister has been dealing with this through the group she's involved in on campus. They hold up and praise the people who are not kissing until they're married... why? That's actually unnatural. Yes, it's important to know and understand your own power and boundaries, but not having that connection can be dangerous to a relationship. What if you never kiss that person until you're married and realize you have no physical chemistry? What then? And what is so wrong with kissing? Or holding hands? My friend's sister is dating a guy and they didn't hold hands until their 6th month of dating! WHAT!?! Why not? What is so wrong with physical intimacy and physical expression of affection/love? If one couple's way of expressing it is through a kiss, that's great. If it's through sex, that's fine. They risk the emotional repercussions and physical dangers of doing it, but even then... that's their choice. It's not my place, or anyone else's, to judge. I need to be careful, of course, of not judging those who choose to not express themselves through physical means and understand that that is the conviction that God has put in their lives/relationship. But because God has given me and them our own convictions, we do not have any room or right to judge one another.
I believe strongly in communication and boundaries and respect. If people have those three things, they can do whatever they want. As long as one person is not taking advantage of, abusing, or manipulating another, whatever is done behind closed doors is their business, not mine. It's time to take the taboo subjects out of the dark and talk about them and agree to disagree. The church teaches that God gave us free will, and yet forces us to believe and act certain ways, within certain guidelines instead of saying, "This is a good idea, but do with it what you want. Explore it, research it, talk about it, wrestle with it, and figure out what you believe and act accordingly." I'm learning to do so, and it's been interesting how many times my thinking does not usually coincide with the traditional teachings of the church and conservative Christians, including my roommate! More times than not, we've disagreed in theological ideas and what is right and wrong. It's actually good that we don't agree on everything because it causes both of us to think about our own and each other's views and why we believe it. Our discussions are always respectful and insightful. I am very thankful for the discussions we have, usually late at night while we're brushing our teeth! And for my sister for asking very thought-provoking questions and being open to all ideas and being respectful to the answers she receives. I love both of them dearly! If we're willing to stretch our comfort zone and ask and answer the difficult questions--no matter what the topic-- we can all grow and sharpen our beliefs more through it. Engage in conversation-- it could change your life!
Posted by
Kate
at
11:19 PM
0
comments
Labels: Christians, convictions, friends, relationships, sex
Monday, March 5, 2007
Happy Birthday to Me!
I'm finally legally allowed to drink!!!!!! Happy 21st birthday to me (well, it was technically on Feb. 28th)! It's amazing how many doors open and opportunities are available when the government thinks you're responsible enough to consume alcohol! The one thing I'm most excited about is being able to go to the store and pick up a bottle of red wine to take to dinner at a friend's house! It's weird the things that I get excited about.
Because of my birthday, I ended up having some pretty interesting conversations with friends and family about the issue of drinking. Being in college, I am constantly surrounded by people whose only view of drinking is to get belligerently drunk and become out of control. Those who do not drink at all are in the minority. But the issue that was discussed was, "what ever happened to responsible drinking?" Do college students lack the ability to learn this? Or the ability to act it out? Does it always have to be an all or nothing ordeal? What happened to having one glass of wine with dinner? Or a cocktail with friends? Why is drinking to get drunk the only way people seem to be able to drink? It especially came out when it came to my birthday because all people would say to me was "I need to get you drunk!" or "We need to go out and party!" or "Let's go shot for shot!" What happened to people just offering to take someone out to get A drink, not drinkS? (And thank you to my best friend for doing so!) When the act of getting completely belligerent is encouraged and nothing else is taught or portrayed, why are colleges (CSU especially) surprised when people are being sent to the hospital for alcohol poisoning and/or dying? The stigma of drinking needs to change and education about alcohol is not going to solve the problem-- learning how to drink responsibly is! You can talk till you're blue in the face about the dangers of alcohol and partying, but it's not really going to help anyone in the long run. So this is an official thank you to my parents for teaching me and my sister how to drink responsibly and to take the "cool" stigma of getting drunk away. We know how to enjoy a cocktail or a glass of wine with dinner, and not expecting to wake up the next morning with a hangover! There's nothing wrong with drinking (even if you get a little tipsy-- I drink one drink and I can feel it-- I'm the walking, talking definition of a lightweight!) as long as you can do it responsibly and know your limits. It's amazing that people are getting a college education and yet cannot seem to grasp this concept... unsolvable mystery.
Posted by
Kate
at
12:25 AM
3
comments
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Confrontation is Not Deadly
Confrontation. Not my favorite word, and definitely not, by any means, my favorite pass-time. So when it comes to dealing with people, I tend to completely avoid and get minor panic attacks at the mere thought of a "confrontation" with anyone!
Well, since it's too late to call my mom to have her praise me for my bold move tonight, I decided I'd write about it... lame, I know :-) But I had to tell someone! Most of you wont think it's a big deal and may even think I'm a big chicken (which I am) for not saying anything before. So here's the story... I have some roommates-- 4 to be exact-- and all girls. Makes for interesting times, that's for sure. Needless to say, I'm slightly afraid of 2 of them. They are completely intimidating. They're super nice to your face and I actually really enjoy hanging out with them... it's when you're not around them that's the problem and it becomes a passive-aggressive and super-tense-and-awkward time. Well, I have bit my tongue enough times when they do things that my tongue is bruised :-P Tonight, I finally got enough courage to talk to one of my roommates about one of the biggest issues I have with her! It was not a fun experience, but definitely needed and was actually productive. We both said what we needed to say, and we reconciled and it was over. No blood was drawn, no voices were raised... it was not the bloody battle I was envisioning. Confrontation is scary but definitely not deadly! That's just what I gotta keep telling myself. "It'll be okay, no one's going to freak out and hate me because I say something. They might even appreciate me talking to them!" I'm still working on confronting people and speaking my mind when I have something negative or hard to say. People want honesty and openness. I want it of other people so why can't I do it for them? It's going to be a long and painful process (panic-attacks... no fun!) but it will make me a better person in the end. Whew! I feel so relieved! Now all I have to do is get my heart rate down enough to go to bed.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
What is the Trinity?
So I had my religions class today and we started our discussion on Christianity. More specifically, we started talking about the never-complicated subject of the Trinity--WHOA! When I was reading our book, "Christian Theology" I was confused at some points and I've grown up in the church and have somewhat of a grasp of what the trinity is and how it functions.
It did help me see, however, how other religions do not believe Jesus is not God. Until now, I never understood how people couldn't believe this-- "of course Jesus is God!" When looking at it that Jesus was a man so how can he be God really got me thinking. It's a pretty heavy subject and I am not about to try to explain it here.
The biggest and most interesting discussion we had in class today was the fact that the Bible only mentions the trinity (but not called the trinity in the Bible) as the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in two verses in the whole Bible! The discussion arose, inevitably, that what if the idea of the trinity was just a man-made idea and we got it totally wrong? That we misunderstood what it meant by the Father/Son/Holy Spirit relationship? No one had a very good answer. They either answered "just because" or "I don't know."
So I started thinking to myself, what would that do to our theology? Our beliefs? I had a discussion with one of my pastors recently about this very subject (about theology changing, not the trinity). We both read the book Velvet Elvis by Rob Bell which I've talked about before, and in it he talks about how people put too much emphasis on the theology of Christianity and miss the big picture. He proposed the idea of (this is definitely a paraphrase) what would it do your faith if you knew that the word used for virgin regarding Mary not only meant someone who hadn't had sex, but also a woman who had had sex only once? And what if it could be proven (by some super-duper sci-fi gizmo) that she was the later definition of virgin? What would that do to your faith? Would it discredit the Bible? Is our faith solely based on theology instead of the message of the Bible? This is just what was going through my mind today during class and I thought I'd share it with everyone. What are everyone's thoughts? Ideas? Insights?
Monday, February 12, 2007
Prayer Warriors
Recently, the discussion of homosexuality has been very prevalent in the conversation I've been having, articles I've been reading, blogs I've read, podcasts I listened to, etc. All of a sudden I have realized I don't know what I believe and why I believe it. The two major issues that the churches of my past have shoved down my throat is that of homosexuality being a sin and abortion being wrong. (Relax, this post is not about abortion... I don't even want to go there!) Anyway, I decided I should make my own mind up about what I believe and be knowledgeable enough to tell others about what I believe and why. I'm usually not very strongly opinionated, but I feel that I should have a strong, solid, educated opinion on the issue of homosexuality.
Coming from a Christian, yet open-minded, family, I have heard both sides of the issue. I have heard what my churches had to say and what my parents had to say. We had long discussions over dinner and in the car about homosexuality. I know what my stance is, but I want to be more educated when I state what it is! I want to be able to engage people in a discussion about it and be able to give them answers and possibly a different perspective on the issue.
Anyway, on the start of my knowledge-journey, I went to the library to look at what books they had in stock to read about Christianity and homosexuality. You'd actually be surprised how many books there are! So I checked out a bunch and here's a little blurb on what I just finished reading:
I just finished reading a book today called, Prayer Warriors: The true story of a gay son, his fundamentalist Christian family, and their battle for his soul. I was really excited to read it because, for one, I enjoy stories and novel-like books as compared to textbook, history-like books (I have two sitting on my shelf waiting to be opened...), and two, I was really interested in what I would learn from this book, through one man's life and struggle with acceptance from his family.
Anyway, the hate and disappointment that came from the parents made me want to scream and yell and punch them in the face. And the more I thought about it, the more I realized that that is how Christians and the church tend to treat homosexuals. When Stuart (the author) came out to his parents, they got angry and told him to never come back home because he was no longer welcome. What kind of parent does that to their kid? How could love and acceptance ride on only one issue? How can people say, "I love you...what? you're gay? Never mind!"? Isn't love supposed to be unconditional? When we treat people like that, not just homosexuals, it's no wonder that people don't like Christians. How can people treat others, like one of my pastors says, like issues, not people? How can people not see beyond the issue and embrace the person behind it? My mom informed me of a woman she knows who went through this exact same thing and it took the siblings of the woman had to go against what the parents thought and said to embrace her and love her despite what they believed or thought. That's what we're supposed to do-- put aside our own agendas and love people for who they are and not focus on the baggage they're bringing along. We all have baggage and issues and sin, so no one has the right to look down on others, no matter what they believe. No one is better than another. That's what Jesus did-- he loved everyone and didn't focus on their issues or problems-- he loved them for their hearts and who they were as people.
That's when I am so excited that I am in a church where one of the pastors and one of the worship guys went to the GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender) office on campus to establish a relationship with them and apologise to them for how the church and Christians treat them. What a relief!
I am still researching (I'm going to crack open the history books... it'll be a long process) and becoming solidified in my viewpoints. It's only been a few weeks in this journey of knowledge, and I've learned so much! Who knows what else I'm going to learn!!! I'll end with a quote from my pastors: "Love God and love people. That's all you have to do."
Posted by
Kate
at
10:54 PM
2
comments
Labels: Christians, church, homosexuality, love
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
An Excuse Not to be Studying
Thanks to Paul for tagging me! I feel oh so special! This will give everyone a little more insight! Enjoy!
A- Available or married? In between... taken, but not married!
B- Best Friend? I have more than one, and they're actually girls, which is exciting :-)But those girls know me and love me just the same and I do the same for them!
C- Cake or Pie? Cake, definitely! mmm... rich, chocolate cake... now I'm hungry!
D- Drink of Choice? cranberry juice with club soda, water, cherry coke, and I'm one month away from being able to legally tell you my favorite drinks with alcohol....
E- Essential Item? My cellphone
F- Favorite Colour? Blue and red, recently leaning more towards the red side
G- Gummi Bears or Worms? You're making me choose? Probably gummi worms just cuz there's more gummi to eat... but the bears are cute... such a hard decision! ;-)
H- Hometown? Colorado born and raised! Centennial, Colorado... not very exciting... I did move from Englewood when I was 9 which is maybe a 10 minute drive at the most so it doesn't really count as changing.
I- Indulgence? If you have spent even 5 minutes with me, you know the answer-- ICE CREAM! Any kind, any brand, any way of eating! But Dreyers Mint Chocolate Chip will forever be my one true love!
J-January or February? February! That's my birthday!! (21 days and counting...)
K- Kids & names? Seeing as I'm not married... none... but someday!
L- Life is incomplete without? Friends and good food! (I am called a "chowhound" except by Michael who calls me a "chow chow")
M-Marriage Date? No time soon!
N- Number of Siblings? 1 wonderful younger sister
O- Oranges or apples? Oranges, definitely! But apples are delicious in salads!
P- Phobias/Fears? Feet-- ICK! And snakes-- they make my skin crawl (no pun intended)!
Q-Favourite Quote? "Let God be as original with other people as He is with you." -Oswald Chambers
R- Reason to Smile? Life! If you smile and laugh a lot, you can't take life too seriously and makes it a lot more enjoyable!
S- Season? Fall/autumn-- perfect weather!
T- Tag three people! Michael, David, and Dan-- this should be fun and interesting!
U- Unknown fact about me: If you've never seen me, I'm only 4' 11.5" tall-- 1.5 inches over the limit for being a "little person"-- If you have seen me (and haven't), I changed my middle name when I was 16 because I hated it so much!
V- Very rare... is a time I don't want to watch a movie or tv show-- I'm addicted!
W- Worst habit? I don't have any bad habits... but eating too much chocolate could be considered a bad habit :-)-- Michael also says that being a "kitchen nazi" is a bad habit of mine!
X- boyfriends...I have many... but I have found a keeper! :-*
Y- Your favourite food? Hamburgers, pizza, chimichangas (my mom's), chocolate, and ice cream! the list goes on and on...
Z- Zodiac? Pisces (why'd I get stuck with stupid fish..."how's that for being born under a bad sign?" [name that movie!]) You will try to take on something that is probably beyond your capabilities. That doesn't mean you shouldn't be prepared to bring in the help you need to pull it off. Money can be made if you think matters through properly. 3 stars-- I don't think I understand... but it is a 3 out of 5 star day,so that's always good! Yeah for the college newspaper!
Posted by
Kate
at
11:44 AM
0
comments
Labels: fun